走进劳动力市场的家庭第一代大学生:基于中国家庭文化价值观的机制分析 |
First-Generation College Graduates Entering the Labor Market:A Mechanism Analysis Based on Chinese Family Cultural Values |
摘要点击: 334 全文点击: 843 |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
中文关键词:家庭第一代大学生 职业收入 中国家庭文化价值观 |
英文关键词:the first-generation college students in families occupational income family cultural values in China |
基金项目:四川省哲学社会科学基金项目一般项目“城乡一体化进程中四川县域普通高中学生的家庭教育期待及协同育人机制研究”(SCJJ23ND334) |
|
中文摘要: |
家庭第一代大学生占中国高校学生的70%以上,这一群体的出现标志着家庭代际传递的重要转变,并成为中国高等教育研究领域的新议题。但现有研究多限于学校场域,还未有从劳动力市场回报和家庭场域并行的视角进行分析。利用中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据,探究家庭第一代大学生在职场上是否具有收入优势以及何以实现其优势。经研究发现:一是相较于非第一代大学生,第一代大学生有显著更高的职业收入;二是80后和中西部地区的第一代大学生的收入优势更显著;三是第一代大学生的家庭经济联结、文化认知和社会资源形成了深层的家庭文化机制,即权威型孝道、自我奋斗和独立自主特质。总之,家庭第一代大学生的诸多特质与其说是一种积极的抉择,不如说是他们在特定社会环境下的适应性反应。 |
英文摘要: |
First-generation college students comprise over 70% of the student population in Chinese universities, representing a significant shift in intergenerational mobility and a burgeoning area of inquiry in higher education research. Existing studies, however, predominantly focus on the educational context, neglecting the interconnected realms of labor market outcomes and family dynamics. Employing data from the 2017 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this study investigates whether first-generation college graduates experience an income advantage in the labor market and explores the underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that first-generation graduates earn significantly higher incomes compared to their non-first-generation counterparts. This income advantage is particularly pronounced among post-1980s cohorts and those located in central and western regions of China. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that family economic networks, cultural perceptions, and social resources contribute to a deeply ingrained family cultural mechanism characterized by authoritative filial piety, self-reliance, and independence among first-generation graduates. Ultimately, many characteristics of these students appear to be adaptive responses to their specific social circumstances rather than conscious individual choices. |