首页 | 期刊简介 | 投稿须知 | 读者订阅 | 编者

《学位法》实施背景下高校学位撤销校规的法治化进路
The Legalization Approach to University Degree RevocationRegulations under the Implementation of the Academic Degrees Law
摘要点击 339  全文点击 891    
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
中文关键词《学位法》  学位撤销  校规清理  备案审查
英文关键词Academic Degrees Law  degree revocation  regulation clean-up  recordation and review
基金项目中国高等教育学会2023年度高等教育科学研究规划课题“适应高质量发展需求的自学考试法规制度体系建设研究”(23ZXKS0405); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2242024S30037)。
作者单位
张雪莲 东南大学 法学院 
中文摘要
      根据《学位法》可以将高校学位撤销校规划分为五类:惩戒性校规、非学术标准类校规、学术标准类校规、撤销程序类校规、复核程序类校规。《学位法》为非学术标准类校规的制定提供法律依据,在没有其他法律依据的情况下,高校无权制定惩戒性校规。根据法律优先原则,《学位法》构成所有标准类校规的上位法规范,两者之间是“规定”关系,高校只能“实施”而不能“创制”撤销标准。《学位法》为程序类校规提供底线标准。其中,撤销程序和复核决定程序属于权利性程序,应遵循正当程序原则;而复核申请程序属于义务性程序,应遵循程序法定原则。对于教育行政部门和高校而言,《学位法》的规范效力体现在消极和积极两个层面:前者要求保障新制定校规的合法性;后者要求消除原有校规与《学位法》规定的不一致或相抵触之处。为此,应参照《学位法》第22条的要求完善校规制定程序,建立分类型审查的备案审查制度,健全教育行政部门主导、高校负责实施的校规清理制度。
英文摘要
      According to the Academic Degrees Law, university regulations for revoking academic degrees can be categorized into five types: disciplinary regulations, non-academic standard regulations, academic standard regulations, revocation procedural regulations, and review procedural regulations. The Academic Degrees Law provides the legal basis for non-academic standard regulations, and without other legal grounds, universities do not have the authority to establish disciplinary regulations independently. Following the principle of legal precedence, the Academic Degrees Law serves as the higher-level legal standard for all types of regulations concerning degree revocation, establishing a "prescriptive" relationship wherein universities may only "implement" but not "create" revocation standards.The Academic Degrees Law sets minimum requirements for procedural regulations, where revocation and review decision procedures are classified as rights-protecting procedures that should adhere to the principles of due process, while review application procedures are obligation-based and must follow the principle of procedural legality. For both educational administrative authorities and universities, the normative effect of the Academic Degrees Law can be understood from both positive and negative perspectives: the former requires ensuring the legality of newly established regulations, and the latter mandates the elimination of any inconsistencies or conflicts between existing regulations and the provisions of the Academic Degrees Law. Accordingly, universities should refer to the requirements in Article 22 of the Academic Degrees Law to improve regulation formulation procedures, establish a classification-based recordation and review system, and develop a regulatory clearing mechanism led by educational administrative authorities and implemented by universities.







您是第3979629位访问者 

版权所有:复旦大学
地址:上海市邯郸路220号光华楼东主楼2804/科学楼434 邮编:200433
电话:(021)55664241 E-mail: jylt@fudan.edu.cn

    本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计,技术支持电话:010-62862645,E-Mail:et_yehu@yahoo.com.cn,网址:http://www.e-tiller.com